National Judicial Commission In India: The New Challenge




NATIONAL JUDICIAL COMMISSION , Art. 50 of our constitution provide


Art. 50 of our constitution provide - separation of powers and independent judiciary (under directive principles) and Art. 13 of the Indian constitution provide vital power to amend any new statute and empowered to Supreme Court to check the constitutional validity of particular act/statute. For much of its history the Indian judiciary has been regarded as largely fair and incorruptible. No action was taken on the bill but the system of Supreme Court appointments that it envisaged was mandated three years later by the Supreme Court itself. In Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association vs. Union of India (1993 (4) SCC. 441) the Court ruled that the Constitution’s provision that the President appoint Supreme Court judges in ‘‘consultation with such Judges of the Supreme the President may deem necessary” (Article 124(2)) meant that the advice of the Supreme Court judges was binding upon the President. It also resolved that the judges involved in this ‘consultation’ would be the Chief Justice of India and the two judges next in seniority. This decision was upheld in 1998 in the Third Judges case, only slightly modified to involve the Chief Justice of India and the four judges – rather than two – next in seniority as well as all Supreme Court judges from the candidate’s High Court. The Supreme Court of India and the High Court’s set the standard for judicial conduct and competence in the country. It is vital that we create a National Judicial Commission, combining input from the elected branches of government and the judiciary, to appoint and over see the judges of the Supreme Court and High Court.


Metrics Loading ...


• M.K. Venu, Author, Editorial Baord, Daily Hindi Nwspaper, Amar Ujala dated 25 Aug. 2014.

• 'A National Judicial Commission - Judicial Appointments and oversight: Vaidya Gullapalli & Jay Prakash Narayan Member/Experts of Lok Satta News Paper - Research Paper.

• A consultation paper on Superior Judiciary, National Commission to review the working of the constitution.

• The Constitution of India, Art. 124 and 217.

Office of the Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs: Federal Judicial Appointments Process

Ontario Courts: Judicial Appointments Advisory Committee

Canadian Judicial Council

Parliament of New South Wales – Research paper on judicial accountability 9DEFCA256ECF000AC6F8

The Process of Appointment of Judges of Some Foreign Countries: Canada, a paper of the Legislative Council Secretariat, Hong Kong

Appointing Judges: A Judicial Appointments Commission for New Zealand? appendixtwo.html#northamerica

The Arab Judicial Forum White Papers, Theme 1: Judicial Selection, Ethics and Training research/pdf_res_notes/rn99-49.pdf

Bron McKillop, The Judiciary in France: Reconstructing Lost Independence

Methods of Removing State Judges (American Judicature Website)

Constitutional Reform Act 2005

Seventh Annual report of the Ontario Judicial Council

Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany,10212/IX.-The Judiciary.htm

Dr Kate Malleson, Creating a Judicial Appointments Commission: Which Model Works Best?, Public Law, pp 102-121, 2004

Carmel Rickard, The South African Judicial Service Commission, Centre for Public Law, University of Cambridge, 2003

A Consultation Paper on Superior Judiciary, National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution.



How to Cite

Dr. Ganesh Dubey, & Dheerendra Singh. (2016). National Judicial Commission In India: The New Challenge. Legal Research Development, 1(I), 67–82.