The Right to a Speedy and Impartial Trial: Safeguarding Justice

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53724/lrd/v10n4.2

Keywords:

Fair trial, speedy justice, Article 21, Cr.P.C., BNSS 2023, judicial delay, access to justice, Right to Quick Trial, Right to Fair Trial, Rule of Law, Judicial Delay, Fundamental Rights, Due Process of Law, Human Rights, Judicial Efficiency, Legal Education

Abstract

A fair and speedy trial is a key element to safeguarding human dignity, the rule of law and effective access to justice. This right is derived from Article 21 of the Indian Constitution and also has been supported by International Human Rights instruments like ICCPR, UDHR etc. Time frames ensure that accused persons are not held in custody for too long and can be released from financial and emotional distress, and that victims are able to receive justice before evidence is lost or memories fade.
This paper aims to analyse the constitutional principles, laws, and court rulings surrounding the concept of a speedy and fair trial in India, drawing on the provisions of the BNSS, 2023, and Cr.P.C., 1973. It examines the situation with regard to backlogs, vacancies, delayed investigations, repeated adjournments and misuse of procedures in courts, which hinders effective realization of this right. The need for fair hearings, good lawyers and consideration of evidence is also discussed.
The paper calls for better judicial infrastructure and effective case management, along with the expansion of e-courts, accessibility of legal aid and increased accountability to achieve lasting improvement. The implementation of a practical justice system is a prerequisite for ensuring speedy and fair justice, which requires the coordination between courts, investigating agencies, legal practitioners and policy makers.

References

A. R. Antulay v. R. S. Nayak, (1992) 1 SCC 225 (India).

African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights. (n.d.). Part I: Rights and duties (Articles 1–26). https://achpr.au.int/en/node/641

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, No. 46 of 2023, Sec. 346, 479 (India).

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, No. 2 of 1974, Sec. 167, 303, 304, 309, 436A (India).

Constitution of India, arts. 14, 21, 22, 39A (1950).

Hussainara Khatoon v. Home Secretary, State of Bihar, AIR 1979 SC 1360 (India).

Imtiyaz Ahmad v. State of Uttar Pradesh, (2012) 2 SCC 688 (India).

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, December 16, 1966, 999 U.N.T.S. 171. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-civil-and-political-rights.

Kadra Pahadiya v. State of Bihar, (1983) 2 SCC 104 (India).

Law Commission of India. (2012). Expeditious investigation and trial of criminal cases against influential public personalities (Report No. 239). https://cdnbbsr.s3waas.gov.in/s3ca0daec69b5adc880fb464895726dbdf/uploads/2022/08/2022081021-2.pdf

Law Commission of India. (2014). Arrears and backlog: Creating additional judicial (wo)manpower (Report No. 245). https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/files/reports/245.pdf

Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, (1978) 1 SCC 248 (India). api.sci.gov.in

P. Ramachandra Rao v. State of Karnataka, (2002) 4 SCC 578 (India).

Raj Deo Sharma v. State of Bihar, (1998) 7 SCC 507 (India).

Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation, (2022) 10 SCC 51 (India). https://judicialacademy.nic.in/hi/node/88806

Shaheen Welfare Association v. Union of India, (1996) 2 SCC 616 (India).

Sheela Barse v. Union of India, AIR 1986 SC 1773 (India).

United Nations General Assembly. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Resolution 217 A [III]). https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights.

United Nations Human Rights Committee. (2007). General comment No. 32: Article 14: Right to equality before courts and tribunals and to a fair trial (CCPR/C/GC/32). digitallibrary.un.org

Vakil Prasad Singh v. State of Bihar, (2009) 3 SCC 355 (India).

Zahira Habibulla H. Sheikh v. State of Gujarat, (2004) 4 SCC 158 (India).

Published

30-06-2026

How to Cite

Chanchal khatri, & Dr. Pradeep Sharma. (2026). The Right to a Speedy and Impartial Trial: Safeguarding Justice. Legal Research Development, 10(IV), 01–10. https://doi.org/10.53724/lrd/v10n4.2

Issue

Section

Articles